I think that we have to be very cautious what we supply in this conflict, there are two major ethnic groups in Ukraine, mostly Russian and mostly German. If Russia is able to capture some of these weapons, it is not far fetched to believe they will reverse engineer these weapons then give blueprints to their allies who are our enemies. Only half of Ukraine supports this war because we share a border and common culture with Russia. We need to monitor all weapons and relations closely. I believe that Zelensky and Zaluzhny are in good command positions but oligarchy is still existent and many backhand deals are taking place out of the public and private eye. Ukraine needs to show gratitude for the training they have received as well as the loss of foreign blood on Ukrainian soil. Everything should be taken with a grain of salt during this conflict. A Ukrainian and Russian will not show their true intentions but even Russian brass is tired of this conflict but public support in Russia is picking up steam. Time is about to run out. Iran and China are using Russia as a buffer for their malicious intentions. Remember that the taliban made a deal with China 2 weeks after the U.S. left and they have access to all our equipment from that war. This is all troublesome, threat intelligence, and global situational awareness needs to come first. I believe Prigozhin intends to coup in Belarus, Lukashenko is a weak leader and I believe this was the deal made between Eastern European leaders. Zhilin out.
4000 isn’t short of missiles. That’s an insane number of missiles at $1.5 million a missile that’s $6 billion just in this missile excluding all the launchers and other infrastructure.
I think that it is reasonable to equate "too many" with "an insane number of." But if you insist, I will revise my remarks to "I don't think 4000 is an insane number of missiles.”
You did on July 18. In fact, you placed “short of" in direct opposition to “an insane number of.”
Please read what you wrote. You said:
"4000 isn’t short of missiles. That’s an insane number of missiles at $1.5 million a missile that’s $6 billion just in this missile excluding all the launchers and other infrastructure."
I think that we have to be very cautious what we supply in this conflict, there are two major ethnic groups in Ukraine, mostly Russian and mostly German. If Russia is able to capture some of these weapons, it is not far fetched to believe they will reverse engineer these weapons then give blueprints to their allies who are our enemies. Only half of Ukraine supports this war because we share a border and common culture with Russia. We need to monitor all weapons and relations closely. I believe that Zelensky and Zaluzhny are in good command positions but oligarchy is still existent and many backhand deals are taking place out of the public and private eye. Ukraine needs to show gratitude for the training they have received as well as the loss of foreign blood on Ukrainian soil. Everything should be taken with a grain of salt during this conflict. A Ukrainian and Russian will not show their true intentions but even Russian brass is tired of this conflict but public support in Russia is picking up steam. Time is about to run out. Iran and China are using Russia as a buffer for their malicious intentions. Remember that the taliban made a deal with China 2 weeks after the U.S. left and they have access to all our equipment from that war. This is all troublesome, threat intelligence, and global situational awareness needs to come first. I believe Prigozhin intends to coup in Belarus, Lukashenko is a weak leader and I believe this was the deal made between Eastern European leaders. Zhilin out.
A shock to learn US is so short of ATACMs!
4000 isn’t short of missiles. That’s an insane number of missiles at $1.5 million a missile that’s $6 billion just in this missile excluding all the launchers and other infrastructure.
I misread the figure as 2000. But I don't think 4000 is too many.
You said they were “short” where are you getting “too many” now I never said that?
I think that it is reasonable to equate "too many" with "an insane number of." But if you insist, I will revise my remarks to "I don't think 4000 is an insane number of missiles.”
Who said “insane number of”?
You did on July 18. In fact, you placed “short of" in direct opposition to “an insane number of.”
Please read what you wrote. You said:
"4000 isn’t short of missiles. That’s an insane number of missiles at $1.5 million a missile that’s $6 billion just in this missile excluding all the launchers and other infrastructure."